On 02/19/2015 10:40 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:02:04AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 11:47:47PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Wed 2015-02-18 17:20:22, Jacek Anaszewski wrote:
Add a documentation of LED Flash class specific sysfs attributes.
Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@xxxxxxxxx>
NAK-ed-by: Pavel Machek
+What: /sys/class/leds/<led>/available_sync_leds
+Date: February 2015
+KernelVersion: 3.20
+Contact: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
+Description: read/write
+ Space separated list of LEDs available for flash strobe
+ synchronization, displayed in the format:
+
+ led1_id.led1_name led2_id.led2_name led3_id.led3_name etc.
Multiple values per file, with all the problems we had in /proc. I
assume led_id is an integer? What prevents space or dot in led name?
Very good point. How about using a newline instead? That'd be a little bit
easier to parse, too.
No, please make it one value per-file, which is what sysfs requires.
The purpose of this attribute is only to provide an information about
the range of valid identifiers that can be written to the
flash_sync_strobe attribute. Wouldn't splitting this to many attributes
be an unnecessary inflation of sysfs files?
Apart from it, we have also flash_faults attribute, that currently
provides a space separated list of flash faults that have occurred.
If we are to stick tightly to the one-value-per-file rule, then how
we should approach flash_faults case? Should the separate file be
dynamically created for each reported fault?
--
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html