What about defining the firmware for Si2148-A20, but since the file is the same as Si2158-A20 just point to the same file? #define SI2148_A20_FIRMWARE "dvb-tuner-si2158-a20-01.fw" Then if Si2158-A20 would in the future get a new firmware that would not work with Si2148, this would not break Si2148. Another point that came to my mind is that we start to have quite a list of chips there in the printouts (Si2147/Si2148/Si2157/Si2158) and more is coming - I'm working with an Si2146 device currently. Should we just say "Si214x/Si215x" there or something? Cheers, -olli On 15 November 2014 03:22, CrazyCat <crazycat69@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2148 is 2158 without analog support. Same firmware. > > 15.11.2014, 03:02, "Antti Palosaari" <crope@xxxxxx>: >> I wonder if we should define own firmware for Si2148-A20 just for sure. >> Olli? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
