On 10/01/2014 08:20 AM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
index a30d400..178fa48 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
@@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ void cx231xx_do_i2c_scan(struct cx231xx *dev, int i2c_port)
int cx231xx_i2c_register(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus)
{
struct cx231xx *dev = bus->dev;
+ char bus_name[3];
BUG_ON(!dev->cx231xx_send_usb_command);
@@ -513,6 +514,10 @@ int cx231xx_i2c_register(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus)
bus->i2c_adap.dev.parent = &dev->udev->dev;
strlcpy(bus->i2c_adap.name, bus->dev->name, sizeof(bus->i2c_adap.name));
+ bus_name[0] = '-';
+ bus_name[1] = '0' + bus->nr;
+ bus_name[2] = '\0';
+ strlcat(bus->i2c_adap.name, bus_name, sizeof(bus->i2c_adap.name));
I am still thinking that. Isn't there any better alternative for this
kind homemade number to string conversion? It is trivial, but for
something on my head says we should avoid that kind of string
manipulation...
printf? num_to_str?
dunno
Antti
bus->i2c_adap.algo_data = bus;
i2c_set_adapdata(&bus->i2c_adap, &dev->v4l2_dev);
--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
