Hi Johannes and Mauro, On 09/25/2014 12:45 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: >> > > Revert is good. Just checked 3.16 and we are good > on that. It needs to be reverted from 3.17 for sure. Mauro! Do you need anything from me for this revert? Please let me know. Gotta be done soon I am guessing with us so close to 3.17 release. > > ok now I know why the second path didn't > apply. It depends on another change that added resume > function > > 7ab1c07614b984778a808dc22f84b682fedefea1 > > You don't need the second patch. The first patch applied > to 3.17 and fails on 3.16 > > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/26073/ > > I am working on 3.16 back-port for the first one to 3.16 > and send one shortly for you to test. > The first patch depends the work done in 3.17, I don't see it meeting the stable rules to go into 3.16. Johannes! Do you need the request_firmware patch for 3.16?? Are you seeing problems there. 3.16 doesn't have b89193e0b06f thanks, --- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
