So this patch adds bus number to adapter name as postfix?
"cx231xx" => "cx231xx-1"
I have no clear opinion for that. I think name should be given when
adapter is crated, not afterwards.
regards
Antti
On 09/25/2014 08:07 AM, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Signed-off-by: Matthias Schwarzott <zzam@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
index a30d400..178fa48 100644
--- a/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/media/usb/cx231xx/cx231xx-i2c.c
@@ -506,6 +506,7 @@ void cx231xx_do_i2c_scan(struct cx231xx *dev, int i2c_port)
int cx231xx_i2c_register(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus)
{
struct cx231xx *dev = bus->dev;
+ char bus_name[3];
BUG_ON(!dev->cx231xx_send_usb_command);
@@ -513,6 +514,10 @@ int cx231xx_i2c_register(struct cx231xx_i2c *bus)
bus->i2c_adap.dev.parent = &dev->udev->dev;
strlcpy(bus->i2c_adap.name, bus->dev->name, sizeof(bus->i2c_adap.name));
+ bus_name[0] = '-';
+ bus_name[1] = '0' + bus->nr;
+ bus_name[2] = '\0';
+ strlcat(bus->i2c_adap.name, bus_name, sizeof(bus->i2c_adap.name));
bus->i2c_adap.algo_data = bus;
i2c_set_adapdata(&bus->i2c_adap, &dev->v4l2_dev);
--
http://palosaari.fi/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
