Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dvb-core: add a new tuner ops to dvb_frontend for APIv5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Em Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:09:55 +0300
Antti Palosaari <crope@xxxxxx> escreveu:

> Moro!
> 
> On 08/29/2014 01:45 PM, Akihiro TSUKADA wrote:
> > moikka,
> >
> >> Start polling thread, which polls once per 2 sec or so, which reads RSSI
> >> and writes value to struct dtv_frontend_properties. That it is, in my
> >> understanding. Same for all those DVBv5 stats. Mauro knows better as he
> >> designed that functionality.
> >
> > I understand that RSSI property should be set directly in the tuner driver,
> > but I'm afraid that creating a kthread just for updating RSSI would be
> > overkill and complicate matters.
> >
> > Would you give me an advice? >> Mauro
> 
> Now I know that as I implement it. I added kthread and it works 
> correctly, just I though it is aimed to work. In my case signal strength 
> is reported by demod, not tuner, because there is some logic in firmware 
> to calculate it.
> 
> Here is patches you would like to look as a example:
> 
> af9033: implement DVBv5 statistic for signal strength
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/25748/

Actually, you don't need to add a separate kthread to collect the stats.
The DVB frontend core already has a thread that calls the frontend status
on every 3 seconds (the time can actually be different, depending on
the value for fepriv->delay. So, if the device doesn't have any issues
on getting stats on this period, it could just hook the DVBv5 stats logic
at ops.read_status().

>From the last time I reviewed the code, the PT3 driver seems to be using
this approach already at the demod.

Getting this value at the tuner makes it a little more trickier,
as you need to use some tuner callback to update the demod cache.
The .get_rf_strength ops is meant to get the signal strength from the
tuner, but it doesn't allow the tuner to return a value in dBm.

It shouldn't be the demod's task to convert a raw value on a tuner client
into dBm. 

After reading this thread and its comments, I think that the best would be
to not add a new callback.

Instead, change the implementation at the .get_rf_strength callback in
a way that it will return an integer from 0 to 65535 that would represent
a "percentage" level, where 100% means the maximum signal that the device
can measure.

Inside the tuner driver (mxl301rf), a call to .get_rf_strength will
directly update the FE stats cache to reflect the signal measurements in
dBm.

So, from the bridge driver, it will just call .get_rf_strength() without
using the returned results. If, latter, we use this tuner on some other
configuration (for example, on an hybrid analog/digital or SDR/digital
board), the V4L2 part will use the "percentage" level, as the V4L2 API
doesn't support returning values in dBm.

Regards,
Mauro

> af9033: implement DVBv5 statistic for CNR
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/25744/
> 
> af9033: implement DVBv5 stat block counters
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/25749/
> 
> af9033: implement DVBv5 post-Viterbi BER
> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/25750/
> 
> regards
> Antti
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux