On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 1:38 AM, Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 4 August 2014 15:03, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 08/04/2014 05:25 AM, Nicholas Krause wrote: >>> This patch changes the call of vb2_buffer_core to use VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ACTIVE >>> inside the for instead of not setting in correctly to VB2_BUFFER_STATE_ERROR. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> Dunno what's going on here after reading Dave Airlie's reply, but: >> > > Nick has decided he wants to be a kernel developer, a laudable goal. > > He however has decided not to take any advice given to me by a number of other > kernel developers on how to work on the kernel. So instead he sends random > broken patches to random subsystems in the hope that one will slip past a sleepy > maintainer and end up in the kernel. > > He isn't willing to spend his own time learning anything, he is > expecting that kernel > developers want to spoon feed someone who sends them broken patches. > > We've asked him to stop, he keeps doing it, then when caught out apologizes > with something along the lines, of I'm trying to learn, "idiot > mistake", despite having > been told to take a step back and try and learn how the kernel works. > > Now we have to waste more maintainer time making sure nobody accidentally > merges anything he sends. > > Dave. All of my merges are not in the main kernel and have been revoked. Cheers Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
