Hi,
On 08/01/2014 06:15 PM, panpan liu wrote:
> Because the api s5p_mfc_queue_setup has already realized the same function
>
> Signed-off-by: panpan liu <panpan1.liu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c | 9 +--------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c
>
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_dec.c
> @@ -544,14 +544,7 @@ static int vidioc_reqbufs(struct file *file, void *priv,
> mfc_err("vb2_reqbufs on capture failed\n");
> return ret;
> }
> - if (reqbufs->count < ctx->pb_count) {
> - mfc_err("Not enough buffers allocated\n");
> - reqbufs->count = 0;
> - s5p_mfc_clock_on();
> - ret = vb2_reqbufs(&ctx->vq_dst, reqbufs);
> - s5p_mfc_clock_off();
> - return -ENOMEM;
> - }
> +
As Hans said, you should always check the latest upstream kernel. Why do
you post patches based on old kernel at ML continuously?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
