* Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [140612 07:52]: > On Wednesday 11 June 2014 07:47:54 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > These should just use either pinctrl-single.c instead for muxing. > > Or if they are not mux registers, we do have the syscon mapping > > available in omap4.dtsi that pbias-regulator.c is already using. > > > > Laurent, got any better ideas? > > The ISS driver needs to write a single register, which contains several > independent fields. They thus need to be controlled by a single driver. Some > of them might be considered to be related to pinmuxing (although I disagree on > that), others are certainly not about muxing (there are clock gate bits for > instance). > > Using the syscon mapping seems like the best option. I'll give it a try. OK if it's not strictly pinctrl related then let's not use pinctrl-single,bits for it. You may be able to implement one or more framework drivers for it for pinctrl/regulator/clock/transceiver whatever that register is doing. In any case it's best to have that handling in a separate helper driver somewhere as it's a separate piece of hardware from the camera module. If it does not fit into any existing frameworks then it's best to have it in a separate driver with the camera driver. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
