On Monday 05 May 2014 15:34:29 Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > From: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > This patch fixes an off by one check in > > bcm2048_set_region(). > > > > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > v2: Send it to the correct list. Re-work the changelog. > > > > This patch has been floating around for four months but > > Pavel and Pali are knuckle-heads and don't know how to use > > get_maintainer.pl so they never send it to linux-media. > > > > Also Pali doesn't give reporter credit and Pavel steals > > authorship credit. > > > > Also when you try explain to them about how to send patches > > correctly they complain that they have been trying but it > > is too much work so now I have to do it. During the past > > four months thousands of other people have been able to > > send patches in the correct format to the correct list but > > it is too difficult for Pavel and Pali... *sigh*. > > Seems like it's not in linux-next as of today, so I am taking > it now. Thanks, I still do not see this patch in torvalds branch... So what is needed to include this security buffer overflow patch into mainline & stable kernels? -- Pali Rohár pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
