Re: [PATCH 2/3] [media] s5p-mfc: Core support to add v8 decoder

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arun,

On 30 April 2014 11:15, Arun Kumar K <arunkk.samsung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sachin,
>
> Thank you for the review.
>
>
> On 04/29/14 22:45, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>
>> Hi Arun,
>>
>> On 23 April 2014 18:27, Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Kiran AVND <avnd.kiran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>> This patch adds variant data and core support for
>>> V8 decoder. This patch also adds the register definition
>>> file for new firmware version v8 for MFC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kiran AVND <avnd.kiran@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pawel Osciak <posciak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>
>> <...>
>>>
>>> +
>>> +/* Returned value register for specific setting */
>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_RET_PICTURE_TAG_TOP_V8      0xf674
>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_RET_PICTURE_TAG_BOT_V8      0xf678
>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_MVC_VIEW_ID_V8              0xf6d8
>>> +
>>> +/* SEI related information */
>>> +#define S5P_FIMV_D_FRAME_PACK_SEI_AVAIL_V8     0xf6dc
>>> +
>>> +/* MFCv8 Context buffer sizes */
>>> +#define MFC_CTX_BUF_SIZE_V8            (30 * SZ_1K)    /*  30KB */
>>
>>
>> Please include header file for size macros.
>>
>
> The file linux/sizes.h is included in regs-mfc-v6.h which
> inturn gets included in this file. Isnt that fine?

Direct inclusions are encouraged. Please add it in this file.

>
>
>> <...>
>>>
>>>   };
>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h
>>> b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h
>>> index 48a14b5..f0e63f5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/s5p-mfc/s5p_mfc_common.h
>>> @@ -23,8 +23,7 @@
>>>   #include <media/v4l2-ioctl.h>
>>>   #include <media/videobuf2-core.h>
>>>   #include "regs-mfc.h"
>>> -#include "regs-mfc-v6.h"
>>> -#include "regs-mfc-v7.h"
>>> +#include "regs-mfc-v8.h"
>>>
>>>   /* Definitions related to MFC memory */
>>>
>>> @@ -705,5 +704,6 @@ void set_work_bit_irqsave(struct s5p_mfc_ctx *ctx);
>>>   #define IS_TWOPORT(dev)                (dev->variant->port_num == 2 ? 1
>>> : 0)
>>>   #define IS_MFCV6_PLUS(dev)     (dev->variant->version >= 0x60 ? 1 : 0)
>>>   #define IS_MFCV7(dev)          (dev->variant->version >= 0x70 ? 1 : 0)
>>
>>
>> Is MFC v8 superset of MFC v7?
>>
>
> Yes it is a superset.
> So the last patch in this series renames IS_MFCV7 to IS_MFCV7_PLUS.

Shouldn't that be done first in that case?

-- 
With warm regards,
Sachin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux