Re: why frameformat instead pixelformat?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/24/14 17:52, Tom wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> while reading into the media-api issue I found out that for configuring the 
> entity pads a frameformat is used.
> 
> For that I found the negotiation rfc of that topic, but I don't really get 
> the relevance of a frameformat.
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg10006.html
> 
> Can anyone explain why the media-api uses the frameformat instead of the 
> pixelformat and what the main differences are?

The pixelformat describes the image format in memory, the mbus_framefmt
describes the image data as it is transferred over a hardware bus.

It's as simple as that. While the two are related (i.e. to get a certain
pixelformat you probably need to set up a specific mbus_framefmt), the
details of this relationship are board or even use-case dependent.

Regards,

	Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux