On 12 February 2014 01:39, James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 11 February 2014 20:14:19 Antti Seppälä wrote: >> Are you working on the wakeup protocol selector sysfs interface? > > I gave it a try yesterday, but it's a bit of a work in progress at the moment. > It's also a bit more effort for img-ir to work properly with it, so I'd > probably just limit the allowed wakeup protocols to the enabled normal > protocol at first in img-ir. > > Here's what I have (hopefully kmail won't corrupt it), feel free to take and > improve/fix it. I'm not keen on the invasiveness of the > allowed_protos/enabled_protocols change (which isn't complete), but it > should probably be abstracted at some point anyway. > Hi James. In general the approach here looks good. At least I couldn't figure any easy way to be less intrusive towards drivers/decoders and still support wakeup filters. I've just sent a new version of my rc-5-sz encoder patches for review. I was thinking that once you are finished with the wakeup protocol sysfs interface maybe you could combine my patchset and your changes into a single "review patch" series and send it to the list? That would keep the entire wakeup filter series easier to track. Br, -Antti -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
