Hi Bryan, On Mon, 10 Feb 2014, Bryan Wu wrote: > On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski > <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Bryan, > > > > Thanks for reiterating this patch! > > > > Sure, my pleasure. I basically assembled your patches together and > change them to use latest V4L2 soc_camera API. > > > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Bryan Wu wrote: [snip] > >> @@ -67,6 +81,8 @@ struct soc_camera_async_client { > >> > >> static int soc_camera_video_start(struct soc_camera_device *icd); > >> static int video_dev_create(struct soc_camera_device *icd); > >> +static void soc_camera_of_i2c_info(struct device_node *node, > >> + struct soc_camera_of_client *sofc); > > > > If you have to resubmit this patch, plase, make sure the second line of > > the above declaration is aligned af usual - under the first character > > _after_ the opening bracket. > > > > No problem, I will update this. > Hmmm, something weird on my side. I did put the second line starting > under the first character after the opening bracket. But in git show > and git format-patch I got this > --- > static int soc_camera_video_start(struct soc_camera_device *icd); > static int video_dev_create(struct soc_camera_device *icd); > +static void soc_camera_of_i2c_info(struct device_node *node, > + struct soc_camera_of_client *sofc); > --- > > But I think that's what you want, right? Don't know - now aöö TABs above are replaced with spaces, so, cannot say. [snip] > >> +{ > >> + struct soc_camera_of_client *sofc; > >> + struct soc_camera_desc *sdesc; > > > > I'm really grateful, that you decided to use my original patch and > > preserve my authorship! But then, I think, it'd be also better to avoid > > unnecessary changes to it. What was wrong with allocation of *sofc in the > > definition line? > > > > Oh, this is really I want to bring up. It's a very subtle bug here. > > If we use local variable sofc instead of zalloc, fields of sofc have > undetermined None NULL value. No. If you initialise some members of a struct in its definition line, the rest will be initialised to 0 / NULL. I.e. in struct foo y = {.x = 1,}; all other fields of y will be initialised to 0. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html