Hi, On 12/15/2013 12:18 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote: <snip>
4) Send the webcams that are not (or not correctly) supported by gscpa to Hans de Goede, and let him add support for them to gspca. I don't know if he wants to, though. He may well decide that it is not worth it, although I assume he would be willing to at least fix gspca for webcams that are not correctly supported.
Or alternatively simply send patches to add support for those not supported to gspca. This should be easy. I've even added support for some a sensor not supported by gspca when a user reported to me he wanted to use his webcam with gspca. Porting over the sn9c102 sensor init code to gspca is pretty easy, the only thing which has stopped me from doing so is not having hardware access. Since in this case I had a user willing to test I added the support.
Note that AFAIK HdG has some of the webcams supported by both gspca and sn9c102, I'm assuming those are working fine with gspca.
Correct I've the following sn9c10x bayer chipset cams I use for testing: Sweex WC001 0c45:6005 sn9c101 tas5110c ok Hewi 0c45:6007 sn9c101 tas5110d ok Trust spacecam 120 0c45:600d sn9c101 pas106 ok Sweex WC004 0c45:6011 sn9c101 ov6650 ok Qware EasyCam WB-001 0c45:6028 sn9c102 pas202 ok Also note that there are 0 bug-reports from users having issues with the gspca_sonixb driver. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html