Hi Hans, On Wednesday 04 December 2013 08:47:25 Hans Verkuil wrote: > On 12/04/2013 02:17 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Tuesday 03 December 2013 10:56:07 Hans Verkuil wrote: > >> On 11/29/13 19:21, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Friday 29 November 2013 10:58:42 Hans Verkuil wrote: > >>>> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> In order to implement vb2 DVB or ALSA support you need to be able to > >>>> start a kernel thread that queues and dequeues buffers, calling a > >>>> callback function for every captured/displayed buffer. This patch adds > >>>> support for that. > >>>> > >>>> It's based on drivers/media/v4l2-core/videobuf-dvb.c, but with all the > >>>> DVB specific stuff stripped out, thus making it much more generic. > >>> > >>> Do you see any use for this outside of videobuf2-dvb ? If not I wonder > >>> whether the code shouldn't be moved there. The sync objects framework > >>> being developed for KMS will in my opinion cover the other use cases, > >>> and > >>> I'd like to discourage non-DVB drivers to use vb2 threads in the > >>> meantime. > >> > >> I'm using it for ALSA drivers which, at least in my case, require almost > >> identical functionality as that needed by DVB. > > > > You're using videobuf2 for audio ? > > For this particular board the audio DMA is just another DMA channel. > Handling audio DMA is identical to video DMA. Why reinvent the wheel? videobuf2 is more about buffer management than DMA management. As the code is based around a two-dimensional, possibly multiplanar, buffer it's quite hackish to reuse it for audio. Doesn't ALSA offer a buffer management library ? > The board I developed this for has somewhat peculiar audio handling (sorry, > it's an internal product and I can't go into details), but I'll do the same > exercise for another board that I can open source and there audio handling > is standard. I want to see if I can use that to develop a videobuf2-alsa.c > module that takes care of most of the alsa complexity. I don't know yet how > that will work out, I'll have to experiment a bit. > > >> But regardless of that, I really don't like the way it was done in the > >> old videobuf framework, mixing low-level videobuf calls/data structure > >> accesses with DVB code. That should be separate. > >> > >> The vb2 core framework should provide the low-level functionality that is > >> needed by the videobuf2-dvb to build on. > > > > Right, but I want to make sure that drivers will not start using this > > directly. > > What sort of use-cases were you thinking of, other than DVB and ALSA? I > don't off-hand see one. That's the thing, I don't see any valid use case, I just want to make sure we won't get crazy use cases implemented with vb2 threads in the future :-) > > It should be an internal videobuf2 API. > > I happily add comments to the source and header mentioning that it is for > core use only and that for any other uses the mailinglist should be > contacted, but I really don't want to mix core vb2 code with DVB code. That > should remain separate. OK, that sounds good with me. What about moving thread support to videobuf2-thread.c ? -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
