Hello Is there anything that needs to be addressed on this patch? Thanks! On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.ribalda@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello Sakari > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 11:12:54AM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: >> ... >>> Also I am not aware of a reason why clamp_t is better than clamp (I am >>> probably wrong here....). If there is a good reason for not using >>> clamp_t I have no problem in reviewing again the patch and use >>> unsigned constants. >> >> clamp_t() should only be used if you need to force a type for the clamping >> operation. It's always better if you don't have to, and all the arguments >> are of the same type: type casting can have an effect on the end result and >> bugs related to that can be difficult to find. >> > > But IMHO in these case, we will cause much more castings in other > places. I find more descriptive a casting via clamp_t, than via (). > > Regards! > >> -- >> Kind regards, >> >> Sakari Ailus >> e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx XMPP: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > -- > Ricardo Ribalda -- Ricardo Ribalda -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
