On Sat, 2013-10-12 at 19:23 -0400, Andy Walls wrote: > On Thu, 2013-10-10 at 22:00 +0100, Rajil Saraswat wrote: > > On 10 October 2013 03:20, Andy Walls <awalls@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-09-18 at 02:19 +0530, Rajil Saraswat wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I have a couple of PVR-500's which have additional tuners connected > > >> to them (using daughter cards). > > > > > > The PVR-500's don't have daughter cards with additional tuners AFAIK. > > > > > > There is this however: > > > http://www.hauppauge.com/site/webstore2/webstore_avcable-pci.asp > > > [snip] > > > > > >> The audio is not usable on either > > >> 1.4.2 or 1.4.3 ivtv drivers. The issue is described at > > >> http://ivtvdriver.org/pipermail/ivtv-users/2013-September/010462.html > > > > > > With your previous working kernel and with the non-working kernel, what > > > is the output of > > > > > > $ v4l2-ctl -d /dev/videoX --log-status > > > > > > after you have set up the inputs properly and have a known good signal > > > going into the input in question? > > > > > > I'm speculating this is a problem with the cx25840 driver or the wm8775 > > > driver, since they change more often than the ivtv driver. > > > > Yes, thats right it is a set of extra inputs and not a separate tuner > > card. I played a video stream fro both kernels. Here are the logs > > > > Working kernel 2.6.35 > > v4l2-ctl -d /dev/video1 --log-status > > > > Status Log: > > > > [50885.487963] ivtv1: ================= START STATUS CARD #1 > > ================= > > [50885.487967] ivtv1: Version: 1.4.1 Card: WinTV PVR 500 (unit #2) > [snip] > > [50885.545429] cx25840 2-0044: Video signal: present > > [50885.545431] cx25840 2-0044: Detected format: PAL-BDGHI > > [50885.545433] cx25840 2-0044: Specified standard: PAL-BDGHI > > [50885.545435] cx25840 2-0044: Specified video input: Composite 4 > > [50885.545437] cx25840 2-0044: Specified audioclock freq: 48000 Hz > [snip] > > [50885.553121] ivtv1: ================== END STATUS CARD #1 > > ================== > > > > For the non-working kernel 2.6.37 > > > > [ 212.730996] ivtv1: ================= START STATUS ================= > > [ 212.731001] ivtv1: Version: 1.4.3 Card: WinTV PVR 500 (unit #2) > [snip] > > [ 212.787820] cx25840 2-0044: Video signal: present > > [ 212.787822] cx25840 2-0044: Detected format: PAL-BDGHI > > [ 212.787823] cx25840 2-0044: Specified standard: PAL-BDGHI > > [ 212.787824] cx25840 2-0044: Specified video input: Composite 4 > [snip] > > Hmm. I have a PVR-500, with the extra input cable hooked up to unit #2 > of the PVR-500 and a DTV-to-CVBS converter box connected. > > My CVBS signal shows up when I am set to PVR-500 'Input 2, Composite 1' > which is cx25840 'Composite 3'. This makes sense for unit #2 of a > PVR-500. It must have the white connector wired differently from unit #1 > of the PVR-500 (and from the PVR-150), since the PVR-500 unit #2 doesn't > have a CVBS input connector on the main card. > > Are you sure you have the input like this and obtain good video from > PVR-500 unit #2, when it is set to 'Input 4, Composite 2', cx25840 > 'Composite 4'? > > Could you try recording with PVR unit #2 set to 'Input 2, Composite 1', > cx25840 'Composite 3'? > > These are the questions in my mind: > > Is your PVR-500 unit #2 wired differently than mine? > Are the older kernels more forgiving when capturing audio with the wrong > input set? (Try both Input 2 and Input 4 with both kernels.) OK, I just tested with my Wii game console connected to the PVR-500 unit #2, Fedora 17, kernel 3.6.10-2.fc17.x86_64. 1. With the unit set to 'Input 2, Composite 1', cx25840 'Composite 3': Good video, good audio 2. With the unit set to 'Input 4, Composite 2', cx25840 'Composite 4': No video, distorted audio. AFAICT: You're using the wrong input. You weren't checking the video, only the audio. I consider this problem resolved. > > Unfortunately, i cannot do a git bisect since it is a remote system > > with a slow internet connection. Is this system for personal or professional use? I don't know of any home users who have remote sites. If for professional use, I'd suggest your employer pay a consultant, if the company/university/whatever can't do a git bisect on a development system in house. -Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html