On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Simon Liddicott <simon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > What form should T2 multiplexes take in the DVB scan files? > > In the uk-CrystalPalace scan file > <http://git.linuxtv.org/dtv-scan-tables.git/blob/HEAD:/dvb-t/uk-CrystalPalace> > the PLP_ID and System_ID are included before the frequency but in > ro-Krasnador scan file > <http://git.linuxtv.org/dtv-scan-tables.git/blob/HEAD:/dvb-t/ru-Krasnodar> > the PLP_ID is included at the end of the line and it has no System_ID. PLP_ID should be the very last entity to preserve compatibility. > I don't have a T2 tuner to test. Is a PLP_ID required in the scan file > as in the UK we only have one? > If you have only a single stream, it wouldn't make any difference if you have a PLP_ID or not. > I presume the System_ID has been included in the Crystal Palace file > because it was known by w_scan, but is it required for T2? > System ID is used for decryption with Conditional Access. If you don't need to use a CA module, then you can ignore it. Regards, Manu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
