On Tue 30 July 2013 17:18:58 Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote: > Thanks for the explanation Hans! > > I finaly manage to pass that one ;) > > Just one more question. Why the compliance test checks if the DISABLED > flag is on on for qctrls? > > http://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git/blob/3ae390e54a0ba627c9e74953081560192b996df4:/utils/v4l2-compliance/v4l2-test-controls.cpp#l137 > > 137 if (fl & V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_DISABLED) > 138 return fail("DISABLED flag set\n"); > > Apparently that has been added on: > http://git.linuxtv.org/v4l-utils.git/commit/0a4d4accea7266d7b5f54dea7ddf46cce8421fbb > > But I have failed to find a reason It shouldn't be used anymore in drivers. With the control framework there is no longer any reason to use the DISABLED flag. If something has a valid use case for it, then I'd like to know what it is. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
