On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 02:28:00PM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Em Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:58:26 -0700 > Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > > > Driver for Si476x series of chips > > > > This is a eight version of the patchset originaly posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/13/590 > > > > Second version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/5/598 > > > > Third version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/510 > > > > Fourth version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/18/572 > > > > Fifth version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/45 > > > > Sixth version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/26/257 > > > > Seventh version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/27/22 > > > > Eighth version of the patch was posted here: > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/26/891 > > > > To save everyone's time I'll repost the original description of it: > > > > This patchset contains a driver for a Silicon Laboratories 476x series > > of radio tuners. The driver itself is implemented as an MFD devices > > comprised of three parts: > > 1. Core device that provides all the other devices with basic > > functionality and locking scheme. > > 2. Radio device that translates between V4L2 subsystem requests into > > Core device commands. > > 3. Codec device that does similar to the earlier described task, but > > for ALSA SoC subsystem. > > > > v9 of this driver has following changes: > > - MFD part of the driver no longer depends on the header file added > > by the radio driver(media/si476x.h) which should potential > > restore the bisectability of the patches > > > > Mauro, I am not sure if you reverted changes in patches 5 - 7, so I am > > including them just in case. > > No, I didn't revert all patches. I just reverted two patches: the > last one, and the one that Samuel asked me. Sorry I didn't have time to check your email from yesterday, but I was actually hoping you would revert the whole patchset, then pull from my mfd-next/topic/si476x branch to fetch the MFD bits and then apply the v4l2/media ones (From patchset v9) on top of that. Does that make sense to you ? Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
