Re: Patchwork and em28xx delegates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 15.04.2013 18:50, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab:
> Em Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:41:44 +0200
> Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
>> I've just noticed that my 2 pending em28xx patches have got delegate
>> assigned:
>>
>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17834/
>> => delegated to mkrufky
>>
>> https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17928/     (Obsoleted)
>> => delegated to hverkuil
>>
>> Ist this a patchwork failure or is the new submaintainers workflow the
>> reason ?
> Sub-maintainers workflow. We expect that most patches will be applied via 
> one of the sub-maintainers. That will likely improve Kernel's quality and
> help to reduce the maintainers overload.

How is the em28xx driver split betweend the submaintainers ?
Where should I send em28xx patches in the future ? You are still the
em28xx maintainer, right ?

Regards,
Frank
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux