Hi Mauro, On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Patchwork <patchwork@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: > > * [v3] davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17737/ > was: New > now: Not Applicable > > * [v2,3/3] davinic: vpss: trivial cleanup > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17733/ > was: New > now: Not Applicable > > * [v2,2/3] media: davinci: vpbe: venc: move the enabling of vpss clocks to driver > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17731/ > was: New > now: Not Applicable > > * davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17692/ > was: Under Review > now: Not Applicable > This should 'suppressed' > * [v2,1/3] media: davinci: vpss: enable vpss clocks > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17732/ > was: New > now: Not Applicable > > * [v2] davinci: vpif: add pm_runtime support > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/17719/ > was: New > now: Not Applicable > This should 'suppressed' . And the rest of the patches are intended to go via media-tree.git. Regards, --Prabhakar > This email is a notification only - you do not need to respond. > > - > > Patches submitted to linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx have the following > possible states: > > New: Patches not yet reviewed (typically new patches); > > Under review: When it is expected that someone is reviewing it (typically, > the driver's author or maintainer). Unfortunately, patchwork > doesn't have a field to indicate who is the driver maintainer. > If in doubt about who is the driver maintainer please check the > MAINTAINERS file or ask at the ML; > > Superseded: when the same patch is sent twice, or a new version of the > same patch is sent, and the maintainer identified it, the first > version is marked as such. It is also used when a patch was > superseeded by a git pull request. > > Obsoleted: patch doesn't apply anymore, because the modified code doesn't > exist anymore. > > Changes requested: when someone requests changes at the patch; > > Rejected: When the patch is wrong or doesn't apply. Most of the > time, 'rejected' and 'changes requested' means the same thing > for the developer: he'll need to re-work on the patch. > > RFC: patches marked as such and other patches that are also RFC, but the > patch author was not nice enough to mark them as such. That includes: > - patches sent by a driver's maintainer who send patches > via git pull requests; > - patches with a very active community (typically from developers > working with embedded devices), where lots of versions are > needed for the driver maintainer and/or the community to be > happy with. > > Not Applicable: for patches that aren't meant to be applicable via > the media-tree.git. > > Accepted: when some driver maintainer says that the patch will be applied > via his tree, or when everything is ok and it got applied > either at the main tree or via some other tree (fixes tree; > some other maintainer's tree - when it belongs to other subsystems, > etc); > > If you think any status change is a mistake, please send an email to the ML. > > - > > This is an automated mail sent by the patchwork system at > patchwork.linuxtv.org. To stop receiving these notifications, edit > your mail settings at: > http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/mail/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
