Am 05.02.2013 23:08, schrieb Mauro Carvalho Chehab: > Em Tue, 05 Feb 2013 22:46:10 +0100 > Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> escreveu: > >> Am 05.02.2013 22:33, schrieb Patchwork: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwork: >> ... >>> * [RFC] em28xx: fix analog streaming with USB bulk transfers >>> - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/16197/ >>> was: New >>> now: RFC >> What's your plan with this patch ? >> We have this regression in the media-tree since a few weeks now. >> Nobody replied to it or came up with a better solution... > Well, you tagged it as RFC. I just marked as such at patchwork. I don't even > read patches tagged as [RFC] or [REVIEW], Uhm... even patches which are sent to you as the maintainer of the _driver_ ? Isn't commenting / reviewing patches the maintainers job ? > as those patches will be > resubmitted later by the patch author, if they're ok, or a new version will > be sent instead. That's what I'm asking you. Is this patch ok / ready ? Or can I generally conclude that patches are fine when there is no reaction on them ? Regards, Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
