On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 18:43 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 5 Nov 2012 20:39:33 +0900
> YAMANE Toshiaki <yamanetoshi@xxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
>
> > fixed below checkpatch error.
> > - ERROR: trailing statements should be on next line
> >
> > Signed-off-by: YAMANE Toshiaki <yamanetoshi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/media/go7007/go7007-fw.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/go7007/go7007-fw.c b/drivers/staging/media/go7007/go7007-fw.c
> > index f99c05b..cfce760 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/media/go7007/go7007-fw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/go7007/go7007-fw.c
> > @@ -725,7 +725,8 @@ static int vti_bitlen(struct go7007 *go)
> > {
> > unsigned int i, max_time_incr = go->sensor_framerate / go->fps_scale;
> >
> > - for (i = 31; (max_time_incr & ((1 << i) - 1)) == max_time_incr; --i);
> > + for (i = 31; (max_time_incr & ((1 << i) - 1)) == max_time_incr; --i)
> > + ;
>
> Nah, this doesn't sound right to me. IMO, in this specific case,
> checkpatch.pl did a bad job.
Is this even guaranteed to exit the loop?
Maybe using ffs would be more sensible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
