On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 09:33:03AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I don't know where the problem started in udev, but the report I saw > was that udev175 was fine, and udev182 was broken, and would deadlock > if module_init() did a request_firmware(). That kind of nested > behavior is absolutely *required* to work, in order to not cause > idiotic problems for the kernel for no good reason. > > What kind of insane udev maintainership do we have? And can we fix it? > > Greg, I think you need to step up here too. You were the one who let > udev go. If the new maintainers are causing problems, they need to be > fixed some way. I've talked about this with Kay in the past (Plumbers conference I think) and I thought he said it was all fixed in the latest version of udev so there shouldn't be any problems anymore with this. Mauro, what version of udev are you using that is still showing this issue? Kay, didn't you resolve this already? If not, what was the reason why? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
