Re: [RFC] Timestamps and V4L2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Laurent,

On 09/25/2012 02:35 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Does the clock type need to be selectable for mem-to-mem devices ? Do device-
specific timestamps make sense there ?

I'd like to clarify one thing here, i.e. if we select device-specific
timestamps how should the v4l2_buffer::timestamp field behave ?

Are these two things exclusive ? Or should v4l2_buffer::timestamp be valid even if device-specific timestamps are enabled ?

With regards to your question, I think device-specific timestamps make
sense for mem-to-mem devices. Maybe not for the very simple ones, that
process buffers 1-to-1, but codecs may need it. I was told the Exynos/
S5P Multi Format Codec device has some register the timestamps could
be read from, but it's currently not used by the s5p-mfc driver. Kamil
might provide more details on that.

I guess if capture and output devices can have their timestamping clocks
selectable it should be also possible for mem-to-mem devices.

--

Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux