Re: [GIT PULL v2] Initial i.MX5/CODA7 support for the CODA driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/20/2012 10:03 AM, Richard Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 09:10:46AM +0200, javier Martin wrote:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> On 20 September 2012 05:32, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> why is it a request-pull?
>>
>> After 5 version of Philipp's patches we have agreed they are good
>> enough to be merged; they don't break anything related to the old
>> codadx6 while provide support for the new coda7:
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/53627
>>
>> The pull request is a way to tell Mauro this is ready to be merged in
>> his linux-media tree and making things easier for him.
> I know the meaning. I just feel strange. Pull request is normally sent
> by maintainer to up level maintainer who agreed to receive pull request.

There is really high volume of various kind of patches on linux-media
mailing lists. Even with those pull requests it becomes hard for Mauro
to respond and merge patches in timely manner. There is even a discussion 
related to this scheduled for media workshop during ELCE/LinuxCon. I think 
the rules may differ slightly across kernel subsystems, hence I find nothing 
unusual in using pull requests, especially by sub-subsystem maintainers or
developers.

Regards,
Sylwester
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux