Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 02:49:39AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> +/**
> + * panel_get_modes - Get video modes supported by the panel
> + * @panel: The panel
> + * @modes: Pointer to an array of modes
> + *
> + * Fill the modes argument with a pointer to an array of video modes. The array
> + * is owned by the panel.
> + *
> + * Return the number of supported modes on success (including 0 if no mode is
> + * supported) or a negative error code otherwise.
> + */
> +int panel_get_modes(struct panel *panel, const struct fb_videomode **modes)
> +{
> + if (!panel->ops || !panel->ops->get_modes)
> + return 0;
> +
> + return panel->ops->get_modes(panel, modes);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(panel_get_modes);
You have seen my of videomode helper proposal. One result there was that
we want to have ranges for the margin/synclen fields. Does it make sense
to base this new panel framework on a more sophisticated internal
reprentation of the panel parameters? This could then be converted to
struct fb_videomode / struct drm_display_mode as needed. This would also
make it more suitable for drm drivers which are not interested in struct
fb_videomode.
Related to this I suggest to change the API to be able to iterate over
the different modes, like:
struct videomode *panel_get_mode(struct panel *panel, int num);
This was we do not have to have an array of modes in memory, which may
be a burden for some panel drivers.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
