Em 20-08-2012 17:46, Hans de Goede escreveu: > Hi, > > On 08/20/2012 09:21 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 20-08-2012 10:02, Hans de Goede escreveu: > > <snip> > >>> Note that luckily these devices do use a unique USB id and not one of the >>> generic em28xx ids so from that pov having a specialized driver for them >>> is not an issue. >> >> Hans, >> >> Not sure if all em2765 cameras will have unique USB id's: at em28xx, >> the known em2710/em2750 cameras that don't have unique ID's; detecting >> between them requires to probe for the type of sensor. > > Right, like the one I gave to Douglas and you or Douglas (don't remember) added > support for. Yes. There are also some other similar cameras, including some special ones (orthodontist usage, afaikt), that worked with the same driver, but with a different sensor. > But that one was a "regular" em28xx using camera, and this one > appears to be a bit funky in places... > > I'll let Frank answer your other remarks. Yep. Let's see his findings before taking any decision on that. Regards, Mauro -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
