Hi Sekhar, On Friday 17 August 2012 11:07 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote: > On 8/17/2012 10:51 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote: >> Hi Laurent, >> >> Thanks for the review. >> >> On Thursday 16 August 2012 08:43 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Prabhakar, >>> >>> Thanks for the patch. >>> >>> On Thursday 16 August 2012 19:32:00 Prabhakar Lad wrote: >>>> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@xxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@xxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@xxxxxx> >>>> Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> --- >>>> drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c | 12 +++++++----- >>>> drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c | 14 ++++++++------ >>>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c >>>> b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c index 266025e..a87b7a5 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_capture.c >>>> @@ -311,12 +311,14 @@ static int vpif_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, >>>> unsigned int count) } >>>> >>>> /* configure 1 or 2 channel mode */ >>>> - ret = vpif_config_data->setup_input_channel_mode >>>> - (vpif->std_info.ycmux_mode); >>>> + if (vpif_config_data->setup_input_channel_mode) { >>>> + ret = vpif_config_data->setup_input_channel_mode >>>> + (vpif->std_info.ycmux_mode); >>>> >>>> - if (ret < 0) { >>>> - vpif_dbg(1, debug, "can't set vpif channel mode\n"); >>>> - return ret; >>>> + if (ret < 0) { >>>> + vpif_dbg(1, debug, "can't set vpif channel mode\n"); >>>> + return ret; >>>> + } >>> >>> This change looks good to me. However, note that you will need to get rid of >>> board code callbacks at some point to implement device tree support. It would >>> be worth thinking about how to do so now. >>> >> Currently VPIF driver is only used by dm646x, and the handlers for this >> in the the board code are not null. This patch is intended for da850 >> where this handlers will be null. >> >>>> } >>>> >>>> /* Call vpif_set_params function to set the parameters and addresses */ >>>> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c >>>> b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c index e129c98..1e35f92 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/media/video/davinci/vpif_display.c >>>> @@ -280,12 +280,14 @@ static int vpif_start_streaming(struct vb2_queue *vq, >>>> unsigned int count) } >>>> >>>> /* clock settings */ >>>> - ret = >>>> - vpif_config_data->set_clock(ch->vpifparams.std_info.ycmux_mode, >>>> - ch->vpifparams.std_info.hd_sd); >>>> - if (ret < 0) { >>>> - vpif_err("can't set clock\n"); >>>> - return ret; >>>> + if (vpif_config_data->set_clock) { >>> >>> Does the DaVinci platform use the common clock framework ? If so, a better fix >>> for this would be to pass a clock name through platform data instead of using >>> a callback function. >>> >> Currently DaVinci is not using the common clock framework. >> >> Can you ACK this patch? > > Yes, DaVinci has not migrated to common clock framework (yet). However, > even without that it should be possible to use clock API in driver code. > Using a callback to enable clocks or even passing the clock name from > platform data would be bypassing an existing framework. Clock name > should be IP specific, so it should be possible to use that in driver. > The callback is not actually dealing with PSC clock's but with system module registers. Thx, --Prabhakar > Thanks, > Sekhar > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html