Thanks Dan.
Let me take a look and get back to you.
Rgds,
Palash
________________________________________
From: Dan Carpenter [dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2012 6:16 AM
To: Palash Bandyopadhyay; mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: re: V4L/DVB (12730): Add conexant cx25821 driver
Hello Palash Bandyopadhyay,
The patch 02b20b0b4cde: "V4L/DVB (12730): Add conexant cx25821
driver" from Sep 15, 2009, leads to the following warning:
drivers/media/video/cx25821/cx25821-i2c.c:310 cx25821_i2c_register()
error: memcpy() '&cx25821_i2c_algo_template' too small (24 vs 64)
306 dprintk(1, "%s(bus = %d)\n", __func__, bus->nr);
307
308 memcpy(&bus->i2c_adap, &cx25821_i2c_adap_template,
309 sizeof(bus->i2c_adap));
> 310 memcpy(&bus->i2c_algo, &cx25821_i2c_algo_template,
311 sizeof(bus->i2c_algo));
312 memcpy(&bus->i2c_client, &cx25821_i2c_client_template,
313 sizeof(bus->i2c_client));
314
The problem is that "bus->i2c_algo" is a i2c_algo_bit_data struct and
cx25821_i2c_algo_template is a i2c_algorithm struct. They are different
sizes and the function pointers don't line up at all. I don't see how
this can work at all.
regards,
dan carpenter
Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
---------------------------------------------------------------------
********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
"This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
**********************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
