Re: Advice on extending libv4l for media controller support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 05/10/2012 05:09 PM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:

Hi Sergio,

On Thu, 2012-05-10 at 08:54 -0500, Sergio Aguirre wrote:
+Atsuo

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Sergio Aguirre
<sergio.a.aguirre@xxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Hi Hans,

I'm interested in using libv4l along with my omap4 camera project to
adapt it more easily
to Android CameraHAL, and other applications, to reduce complexity of
them mostly...

So, but the difference is that, this is a media controller device I'm
trying to add support for,
in which I want to create some sort of plugin with specific media
controller configurations,
to avoid userspace to worry about component names and specific
usecases (use sensor resizer, or SoC ISP resizer, etc.).

So, I just wanted to know your advice on some things before I start
hacking your library:


Probably following links can help you. They have been tested
with the OMAP3 ISP.

Regards,
iivanov

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-media/msg31901.html
[2]
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/32704

Ah, cool. But that is a bit old stuff. IIRC (pretty sure I do), then we
came to the conclusion that the following would be the best solution:

1) The existing mediactl lib would be extended with a libmediactlvideo lib, which
would be able to control media-ctrl video chains, ie it can:
-give a list of possibly supported formats / sizes / framerates
-setup the chain to deliver a requested format
Since the optimal setup will be hardware specific the idea was to give this
libs per soc plugins, and a generic plugin for simple socs / as fallback.

2) A cmdline utility to set up a chain using libmediactlvideo, so that things
can be tested using raw devices, ie without libv4l2 coming into play, just
like apps like v4l2-ctl allow low level control mostly for testing purposes

3) There would then be a libv4l2 plugin much like the above linked omap3 plugin,
but then generic for any mediactl using video devices, which would use
libmediactlvideo to do the work of setting up the chain (and which will fail to
init when the to be opened device is not part of a mediactl controlled chain).

And AFAIK some work was done in this direction. Sakari? Laurent?

Eitherway it is about time someone started working on this, and I would
greatly prefer the above plan to be implemented. Once we have this in place,
then we can do a new v4l-utils release which officially supports the plugin
API (which currently only lives in master, not in any releases).

Regards,

Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux