Hi Hans, On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:19:57 +0200 Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > You say that the marker cannot be in the range 0..31 (index 0..7), but > > I have never seen a value lower than 68 (index 17). > > If you change register 0x80 in bank/page 1 to > 42 on pac7311 or larger then > circa 100 on pac7302, you will get markers with bit 8 set. When this happens > you will initially get markers 0xa0 - 0xa4 ... 0xbc and the stream tends to > stabilize on 0xbc. Likewise if you remove the artificial limiting of > the pac7302 to 15 fps from the driver you will get markers 0x44 - 0x48 ... > 0x7c. > > The images look a lot better with bit 8 set, so I plan to run some tests > wrt what framerates can safely handle that (it uses more bandwidth) and set > bit 8 on lower framerates. I carefully looked at the ms-windows pac7302 traces I have. The register 1-80 stays always in the range 0d..11, except sometimes 19 at start time. In these traces, the images with marker 44 (dec 68) look really better with all 08's as the quantization table. [snip] > Yeah short of someone disassembling and reverse-engineering the windows driver > we will probably never figure out the exact correct tables. Well, I got the SPC230NC.SYS of the ms-windows pac7302 driver, but it is not easy to disassemble because it has no symbol table. But, inside, I found this tables just before the Huffman table: - 0006C888 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 - 0006C908 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 - 0006C988 08 08 08 08 08 08 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 - 0006CA08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 - 0006CA88 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 - 0006CB08 08 0b 0b 0b 0b 0b 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 40 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 - 0006CB88 11 12 12 18 15 18 2f 1a 1a 2f 63 42 38 42 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 - 0006CC08 10 0b 0c 0e 0c 0b 10 0e 0d 0e 12 11 10 13 18 28 1a 18 16 16 18 31 23 25 1d 28 3a 33 3d 3c 39 33 38 37 40 48 5c 4e 40 44 57 45 37 38 50 6D 51 57 5F 62 67 68 67 3E 4D 71 78 70 64 78 5C 65 67 63 Don't they look like quantization tables? (the table 0006CB08 is quite the same the flat table you tried!) BTW, I don't think the exposure and gain controls use the right registers as they are coded in the actual gspca pac7302 subdriver. The ms-windows driver uses the registers (3-80 / 3-03), (3-05 / 3-04), (3-12) and (1-80) for autogain/exposure. The gspca test tarball of my web site includes a new AGC using these registers, but it does not work well. Maybe you could tell me what is wrong with it... Regards. -- Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! ** Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
