On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 12:04:07PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> > Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> >
> > >> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be
> > >> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from
> > >> kernel.org?
> > >
> > > Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except
> > > 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate.
> >
> > Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, in
> > the hope that some interested person can confirm they still work. The
> > only backporting needed was to adjust to the lack of
> > drivers/staging/lirc -> drivers/staging/media/lirc renaming.
>
> So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right?
Yes, only for 3.2 a simple cherry-pick should work.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
