Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 02:39:13PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 21:45 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >>>> Would some of these patches (e.g., at least patches 1, 2, and 5) be >>>> appropriate for inclusion in the 3.0.y and 3.2.y stable kernels from >>>> kernel.org? >>> >>> Assuming they haven't caused any regressions, I think everything except >>> 9b98d6067971 (4/5) would be appropriate. >> >> Great. Here are the aforementioned patches rebased against 3.0.y, [...] > So they should also go to 3.2-stable, right? Yes. Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
