On Tuesday 06 March 2012 21:55:52 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Tomasz Stanislawski wrote: > > On 03/06/2012 05:27 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >> On Tuesday 06 March 2012 17:50:36 Sakari Ailus wrote: > >>> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 11:59:22AM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>>> On Friday 02 March 2012 19:30:12 Sakari Ailus wrote: > >>>>> Add support for VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION and > >>>>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_SELECTION > >>>>> IOCTLs. They replace functionality provided by VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP > >>>>> and > >>>>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP IOCTLs and also add new functionality > >>>>> (composing). > >>>>> > >>>>> VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_CROP and VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP continue to be > >>>>> supported. > >>>>> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@xxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Except for the ACTIVE name, > >>>> > >>>> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>> > >>>> Maybe we could discuss this on IRC with Tomasz ? > >>> > >>> Tomasz wasn't online when I checked. > >>> > >>> How about "CURRENT"? > >> > >> Sounds good to me. Let's see if Tomasz will be online tomorrow ;-) > > > > Hi, > > > > What do you think about ACTIVE -> ACTUAL? > > Similar word with the same number of letters :) > > Sounds good to me; perhaps even better than CURRENT. I'm fine with > either with perhaps a small inclination towards "actual". > > Laurent? ACTUAL is good. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
