Hi Sakari,
Thanks for the review.
On Tuesday 06 March 2012 17:04:04 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:09:46PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > From: Martin Hostettler <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > The MT9M032 is a parallel 1.6MP sensor from Micron controlled through I2C.
> >
> > The driver creates a V4L2 subdevice. It currently supports cropping, gain,
> > exposure and v/h flipping controls in monochrome mode with an
> > external pixel clock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Hostettler <martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[snip]
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mt9m032.c b/drivers/media/video/mt9m032.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..8c69099
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/media/video/mt9m032.c
[snip]
> > +struct mt9m032 {
> > + struct v4l2_subdev subdev;
> > + struct media_pad pad;
> > + struct mt9m032_platform_data *pdata;
> > +
> > + struct v4l2_ctrl_handler ctrls;
> > + struct {
> > + struct v4l2_ctrl *hflip;
> > + struct v4l2_ctrl *vflip;
> > + };
> > +
> > + bool streaming;
> > +
> > + int pix_clock;
>
> unsigned?
No comment ;-) I'll fix this.
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt format;
> > + struct v4l2_rect crop;
> > + struct v4l2_fract frame_interval;
> > +};
[snip]
> > +static unsigned long mt9m032_row_time(struct mt9m032 *sensor, int width)
> > +{
> > + int effective_width;
>
> unsigned, this & width?
...
> > + u64 ns;
> > +
> > + effective_width = width + 716; /* emperical value */
> > + ns = div_u64(((u64)1000000000) * effective_width, sensor->pix_clock);
> > + dev_dbg(to_dev(sensor), "MT9M032 line time: %llu ns\n", ns);
>
> The sensor is using rows internally for exposure as is SMIA++ sensor. Should
> we use a different control or the same?
>
> Some sensors also provide additional fine exposure control, which is in
> pixels. It doesn't make sense to change the fine exposure time except in
> very special situations, i.e. normally it's 0.
I would prefer keeping the same control for now. We have enough new features
to introduce already :-)
> > + return ns;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mt9m032_update_timing(struct mt9m032 *sensor,
> > + struct v4l2_fract *interval)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&sensor->subdev);
> > + struct v4l2_rect *crop = &sensor->crop;
> > + unsigned long row_time;
> > + unsigned int min_vblank;
> > + unsigned int vblank;
> > +
> > + if (!interval)
> > + interval = &sensor->frame_interval;
> > +
> > + row_time = mt9m032_row_time(sensor, crop->width);
> > +
> > + vblank = div_u64(1000000000ULL * interval->numerator,
> > + ((u64)interval->denominator) * row_time)
> > + - crop->height;
> > +
> > + if (vblank > MT9M032_MAX_BLANKING_ROWS) {
> > + /* hardware limits to 11 bit values */
> > + interval->denominator = 1000;
> > + interval->numerator =
> > + div_u64((crop->height + MT9M032_MAX_BLANKING_ROWS) *
> > + (u64)row_time * interval->denominator,
> > + 1000000000ULL);
> > + vblank = div_u64(1000000000ULL * interval->numerator,
> > + ((u64)interval->denominator) * row_time)
> > + - crop->height;
> > + }
> > + /* enforce minimal 1.6ms blanking time. */
> > + min_vblank = 1600000 / row_time;
> > + vblank = clamp_t(unsigned int, vblank, min_vblank,
> > + MT9M032_MAX_BLANKING_ROWS);
> > +
> > + return mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_VBLANK, vblank);
> > +}
>
> You'd get rid of these calculations with the new sensor control interface.
>
> I'm fine with you starting to support that later on but that would change
> the user space API for this driver. Is that an issue?
I don't see that as an issue.
> We still need the generic library so the applications still can use these
> drivers as in the past.
[snip]
> > +static int mt9m032_set_pad_format(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_fh *fh,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_format *fmt)
> > +{
> > + struct mt9m032 *sensor = to_mt9m032(subdev);
> > +
> > + if (sensor->streaming)
> > + return -EBUSY;
>
> Setting try formats should succeed while streaming, shouldn't it?
Yes. I'll fix that.
> > + /* Scaling is not supported, the format is thus fixed. */
> > + return mt9m032_get_pad_format(subdev, fh, fmt);
> > +}
[snip]
> > +static int mt9m032_set_crop(struct v4l2_subdev *subdev,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_fh *fh,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_crop *crop)
> > +{
> > + struct mt9m032 *sensor = to_mt9m032(subdev);
> > + struct v4l2_mbus_framefmt *format;
> > + struct v4l2_rect *__crop;
> > + struct v4l2_rect rect;
> > +
> > + if (sensor->streaming)
> > + return -EBUSY;
>
> Same for crop.
Will fix too.
> Selection API support would be nice here.
Sure, once that gets in mainline :-)
> > + rect.top = clamp(crop->rect.top, 0,
> > + MT9M032_HEIGHT - MT9M032_MINIMALSIZE) & ~1;
> > + rect.left = clamp(crop->rect.left, 0,
> > + MT9M032_WIDTH - MT9M032_MINIMALSIZE);
> > + rect.height = clamp(crop->rect.height, MT9M032_MINIMALSIZE,
> > + MT9M032_HEIGHT - rect.top);
> > + rect.width = clamp(crop->rect.width, MT9M032_MINIMALSIZE,
> > + MT9M032_WIDTH - rect.left) & ~1;
> > +
> > + __crop = __mt9m032_get_pad_crop(sensor, fh, crop->which);
> > +
> > + if (rect.width != __crop->width || rect.height != __crop->height) {
> > + /* Reset the output image size if the crop rectangle size has
> > + * been modified.
> > + */
> > + format = __mt9m032_get_pad_format(sensor, fh, crop->which);
> > + format->width = rect.width;
> > + format->height = rect.height;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *__crop = rect;
> > + crop->rect = rect;
> > +
> > + if (crop->which != V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return mt9m032_update_geom_timing(sensor);
> > +}
[snip]
> > +static int mt9m032_set_exposure(struct mt9m032 *sensor, s32 val)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_client *client = v4l2_get_subdevdata(&sensor->subdev);
> > + int shutter_width;
> > + u16 high_val, low_val;
> > + int ret;
>
> What's the unit of the exposure control? I'd use lines but I think this
> driver uses something else.
The driver seems to use microseconds. I'm thinking about switching that to
lines. What's your opinion ?
> > + /* shutter width is in row times */
> > + shutter_width = (val * 1000)
> > + / mt9m032_row_time(sensor, sensor->crop.width);
> > +
> > + high_val = (shutter_width >> 16) & 0xf;
> > + low_val = shutter_width & 0xffff;
> > +
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_SHUTTER_WIDTH_HIGH, high_val);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_SHUTTER_WIDTH_LOW,
> > + low_val);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
[snip]
> > +static int mt9m032_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > + const struct i2c_device_id *devid)
> > +{
> > + struct i2c_adapter *adapter = client->adapter;
> > + struct mt9m032 *sensor;
> > + int chip_version;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA)) {
> > + dev_warn(&client->dev,
> > + "I2C-Adapter doesn't support I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD\n");
> > + return -EIO;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!client->dev.platform_data)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + sensor = kzalloc(sizeof(*sensor), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (sensor == NULL)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + sensor->pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
> > +
> > + v4l2_i2c_subdev_init(&sensor->subdev, client, &mt9m032_ops);
> > + sensor->subdev.flags |= V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * This driver was developed with a camera module with seperate
external
> > + * pix clock. For setups which use the clock from the camera
interface
> > + * the code will need to be extended with the appropriate platform
> > + * callback to setup the clock.
> > + */
>
> Does this comment have something to do with the code below?
I'll remove that.
> > + chip_version = mt9m032_read(client, MT9M032_CHIP_VERSION);
> > + if (chip_version != MT9M032_CHIP_VERSION_VALUE) {
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "MT9M032 not detected, wrong version "
> > + "0x%04x\n", chip_version);
> > + ret = -ENODEV;
> > + goto free_sensor;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_info(&client->dev, "MT9P031 detected at address 0x%02x\n",
> > + client->addr);
> > +
> > + sensor->frame_interval.numerator = 1;
> > + sensor->frame_interval.denominator = 30;
> > +
> > + sensor->crop.left = 416;
> > + sensor->crop.top = 360;
> > + sensor->crop.width = 640;
> > + sensor->crop.height = 480;
>
> Why such a default setup?
I have no idea :-) I'll change the default to the whole pixel array.
> > + sensor->format.width = sensor->crop.width;
> > + sensor->format.height = sensor->crop.height;
> > + sensor->format.code = V4L2_MBUS_FMT_Y8_1X8;
> > + sensor->format.field = V4L2_FIELD_NONE;
> > + sensor->format.colorspace = V4L2_COLORSPACE_SRGB;
> > +
> > + v4l2_ctrl_handler_init(&sensor->ctrls, 4);
> > +
> > + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&sensor->ctrls, &mt9m032_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_GAIN, 0, 127, 1, 64);
> > +
> > + sensor->hflip = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&sensor->ctrls,
> > + &mt9m032_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_HFLIP, 0, 1, 1, 0);
> > + sensor->vflip = v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&sensor->ctrls,
> > + &mt9m032_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_VFLIP, 0, 1, 1, 0);
> > + v4l2_ctrl_cluster(2, &sensor->hflip);
> > +
> > + v4l2_ctrl_new_std(&sensor->ctrls, &mt9m032_ctrl_ops,
> > + V4L2_CID_EXPOSURE, 0, 8000, 1, 1700); /* 1.7ms */
> > +
> > + if (sensor->ctrls.error) {
> > + ret = sensor->ctrls.error;
> > + dev_err(&client->dev, "control initialization error %d\n", ret);
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + }
> > +
> > + sensor->subdev.ctrl_handler = &sensor->ctrls;
> > + sensor->pad.flags = MEDIA_PAD_FL_SOURCE;
> > + ret = media_entity_init(&sensor->subdev.entity, 1, &sensor->pad, 0);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > +
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_RESET, 1); /* reset on */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_RESET, 0); /* reset off */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > +
> > + ret = mt9m032_setup_pll(sensor);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + usleep_range(10000, 11000);
> > +
> > + v4l2_ctrl_handler_setup(&sensor->ctrls);
> > +
> > + /* SIZE */
> > + ret = mt9m032_update_geom_timing(sensor);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > +
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, 0x41, 0x0000); /* reserved !!! */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, 0x42, 0x0003); /* reserved !!! */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, 0x43, 0x0003); /* reserved !!! */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, 0x7f, 0x0000); /* reserved !!! */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + if (sensor->pdata->invert_pixclock) {
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_PIX_CLK_CTRL,
> > + MT9M032_PIX_CLK_CTRL_INV_PIXCLK);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_RESTART, 1); /* Restart on */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + msleep(100);
> > + ret = mt9m032_write(client, MT9M032_RESTART, 0); /* Restart off */
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > + msleep(100);
> > + ret = update_formatter2(sensor, false);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + goto free_ctrl;
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > +free_ctrl:
> > + v4l2_ctrl_handler_free(&sensor->ctrls);
> > +
> > +free_sensor:
> > + kfree(sensor);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
[snip]
> > diff --git a/include/media/mt9m032.h b/include/media/mt9m032.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..804e0a5
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/media/mt9m032.h
[snip]
> > +struct mt9m032_platform_data {
> > + u32 ext_clock;
> > + u32 pix_clock;
> > + int invert_pixclock;
>
> unsigned?
bool ?
> > +
> > +};
> > +#endif /* MT9M032_H */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
