On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:34:02 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
2012/2/29 Michal Nazarewicz <mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:35:42 +0100, Barry Song <21cnbao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and i also write a simple kernel helper to test the CMA:
Would it make sense to make a patch out of it putting it to tools/cma (or
similar)?
i can send a patch for this. i am just thinking, should it be placed
in tools/ as a test utility or Documents/ as an example to explain CMA
to users who want to use cma.
I'd put it in tools/.
i also think we should have a seperate document to explain cma in details
in documents/, and my helper program can be placed there.
I'm currently writing an article for LWN which I hope will also lead to something
worth putting in Documentation/.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +----<email/xmpp: mpn@xxxxxxxxxx>--------------ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
