On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 17:24:24 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 04:03:21PM +0000, James Simmons wrote: > > Fbcon scrolling at be painful at HD or better modes. Fbcon needs 3 > > possible accels; copyarea, imageblit, and fillrect. The first two could be > > hooked from the TTM layer. Its something I plan to experiment to see if > > its worth it. > > Let's bite into this ;-) I know that fbcon scrolling totally sucks on big > screens, but I also think it's a total waste of time to fix this. Imo > fbcon has 2 use-cases: > - display an OOSP. > - allow me to run fsck (or any other desaster-recovery stuff). 3. Show panics. Ensuring that nothing prevents the switch to fbcon and displaying the panic message is the reason why we haven't felt inclined to accelerate fbcon - it just gets messy for no real gain. For example: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=48933 which doesn't handle flushing of pending updates via the GPU when writing with the CPU during interrupts (i.e. a panic). -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
