Hi Sascha
Thanks for the patch. Just one question:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> The i.MX27 dma support was introduced with the initial commit of
> this driver and originally created by me. However, I never got
> this stable due to the racy dma engine and used the EMMA engine
> instead. As the DMA support is most probably unused and broken in
> its current state, remove it. This also helps us to get rid of
> another user of the legacy i.MX DMA support,
> Also, remove the dependency on ARCH_MX* macros as these are scheduled
> for removal.
>
> This patch only removes the use_emma variable and assumes it's
> hardcoded '1'. The resulting dead code is removed in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c b/drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c
> index 04aab0c..65709e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/video/mx2_camera.c
[snip]
> @@ -1620,7 +1616,6 @@ static int __devinit mx2_camera_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (res_emma && irq_emma >= 0) {
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Using EMMA\n");
> - pcdev->use_emma = 1;
> pcdev->res_emma = res_emma;
> pcdev->irq_emma = irq_emma;
> if (mx27_camera_emma_init(pcdev))
If emma is becoming the only way to use this driver on i.MX27, shouldn't
the EMMA memory and IRQ resources become compulsory? I.e., if any of them
is missing we should error out?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
