Hi Guennadi, >> I suggest you hold on this patch until the new series is accepted and >> then merge both at the same time. >> >> What do you think? > > Ok, I'll be reviewing that patch series hopefully soon, and in principle > it is good, that the buffer counting will really be fixed in it, but in an > ideal world it would be better to have this your patch merged into patch > 2/4 of the series, agree? Would I be asking too much of you if I suggest > that? Feel free to explain why this wouldn't work or just reject if you're > just too tight on schedule. I'll see ifI can swallow it that way or maybe > merge myself :-) If you, Sascha, or someone else comes up with some requests or fixes to the new series I don't mind to rebase it so you can just ignore this patch, since I would have to sent a v2 version of the series anyway. Regards. -- Javier Martin Vista Silicon S.L. CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345 Avda de los Castros s/n 39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain +34 942 25 32 60 www.vista-silicon.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
