Hi Sakari, On Tuesday 10 January 2012 00:26:46 Sakari Ailus wrote: > Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Monday 09 January 2012 23:32:06 Sakari Ailus wrote: > >> Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Monday 09 January 2012 18:38:25 Sakari Ailus wrote: > ... > > >>>> A fourth section may be required as well: at this level the frame rate > >>>> (or frame time) range makes more sense than the low-level blanking > >>>> values. The blanking values can be calculated from the frame time and > >>>> a flag which tells whether either horizontal or vertical blanking > >>>> should be preferred. > >>> > >>> How does one typically select between horizontal and vertical blanking > >>> ? Do mixed modes make sense ? > >> > >> There are minimums and maximums for both. You can increase the frame > >> time by increasing value for either or both of them --- to achieve very > >> long frame times you may have to use both, but that's not very common in > >> practice. I think we should have a flag to tell which one should be > >> increased first --- the effect would be to have the minimum possible > >> value on the other. > > > > But how do you decide in practice which one to increase when you're an > > application (or middleware) developer ? > > I think it's the responsibility of this library to do that, unless the > user wants really, really precise control in which case they have to > deal with the blanking values directly. In general it should be the > library. And how does the library decide ? :-) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
