On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:13:19AM +0100, Olivier Grenie wrote: > Dear Dan, > Indeed, after the "if (state->rf_ramp == NULL)" test, the function > dib0090_set_rframp_pwm will set the state->rf_ramp. So after this > line, state->rf_ramp can not be NULL. > Ah right. I should have seen that myself. > But I can make a patch in order to make sure that this code will > not be detected as an error. Don't do that if you don't want to. This is fixable on the static checker side of things. regards, dan carpenter
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
