Hi Manju, On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 15:48:53, Hadli, Manjunath wrote: > Re-arrange definitions and remove unnecessary code so that we canx These are two different things and should be done in separate patches. Sergei has already pointed out couple of instances. > have a common header for all davinci platforms. This will enable You mean all DMx platforms? DA8x and TNETVx will still have their own header files after this patch set. > us to share defines and enable common routines to be used without > polluting hardware.h. > This patch set forms the base for a later set of patches for having > a common system module base address (DAVINCI_SYSTEM_MODULE_BASE). > > Changes from previous version(As per Sergei's comments): > 1. Renamed davinci_common.h to davinci.h. > 2. Added extra line whereever appropriate. > 3. removed unnecessary header inclusion. > > Manjunath Hadli (5): > ARM: davinci: dm644x: remove the macros from the header to move to c > file > ARM: davinci: dm365: remove the macros from the header to move to c > file > ARM: davinci: dm646x: remove the macros from the header to move to c > file These headlines should describe the changes better. You are moving _private_ defines to C file (to reduce header file pollution). That should be clear from the headline. > ARM: davinci: create new common platform header for davinci > ARM: davinci: delete individual platform header files and use a > common header > > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-evm.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm355-leopard.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm644x-evm.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-neuros-osd2.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-sffsdr.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c | 2 +- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c | 18 +++++- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c | 9 +++- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c | 9 +++- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/davinci.h | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ This file should be placed in arch/arm/mach-davinci itself since the definitions are private to arch/arm/mach-davinci. Russell has been complaining about placing unnecessary files in include/mach. Thanks, Sekhar -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html