Hello, On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:24:35 +0100, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > We should instead fix the V4L2 specification to mandate the use of a > monotonic clock (which could then also support hardware timestamps when > they are available). Would such a change be acceptable ? I'd rather have the real time clock everywhere, than a driver-dependent clock, if it comes to that. Nevertheless, I agree that the monotonic clock is better than the real time clock. In user space, VLC, Gstreamer already switched to monotonic a while ago as far as I know. And I guess there is no way to detect this, other than detect ridiculously large gap between the timestamp and the current clock value? -- Rémi Denis-Courmont http://www.remlab.net/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
