On 10/29/2011 06:25 PM, Piotr Chmura wrote: > > W dniu 29.10.2011 15:17, Piotr Chmura pisze: >> >> W dniu 29.10.2011 12:22, Sylwester Nawrocki pisze: >>> On 10/18/2011 09:51 PM, Piotr Chmura wrote: >>>> Patch taken from http://kernellabs.com/hg/~dheitmueller/v4l-dvb-as102-2/ >>>> >>>> Original source and comment: >>>> # HG changeset patch >>>> # User Devin Heitmueller<dheitmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> # Date 1267318701 18000 >>>> # Node ID 69c8f5172790784738bcc18f8301919ef3d5373f >>>> # Parent b91e96a07bee27c1d421b4c3702e33ee8075de83 >>>> as102: checkpatch fixes >>>> >>>> From: Devin Heitmueller<dheitmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> Fix make checkpatch issues reported against as10x_cmd.c. >>>> >>>> Priority: normal >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Devin Heitmueller<dheitmueller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> Signed-off-by: Piotr Chmura<chmooreck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Hi Piotr, >>> >>> starting from this patch the series doesn't apply cleanly to >>> staging/for_v3.2 tree. Which branch is it based on ? >>> >>> --- >>> Thanks, >>> Sylwester >> Hi Sylwester, >> >> I'is based on >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git kernel-3.1.0-git9+ >> >> All patches are working on newly created driver directory drivers/staging/media/as102 >> (exception is 13/14: staging/Makefile and staging/Kconfig) and they apply cleanly in >> my tree. Let me know why they doesn't on yours and i'll try to fix them. > One more thing... patches starting from 4/14 in patchwork have > > "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in..." > > on the end. > > Isn't this making them wrong ? This shouldn't be an issue, I've also used patches saved directly form an e-mail client which didn't have this text appended and the patch didn't apply in same way. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
