Hi Guennadi, On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:49:52PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2011, Hans Verkuil wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 08, 2011 09:46:26 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> > > > --- > > [snip] > > > > + <para>When the ioctl is called with a pointer to this structure the driver > > > +will attempt to allocate up to the requested number of buffers and store the > > > +actual number allocated and the starting index in the > > > +<structfield>count</structfield> and the <structfield>index</structfield> fields > > > +respectively. On return <structfield>count</structfield> can be smaller than > > > +the number requested. The driver may also adjust buffer sizes as it sees fit, > > > > Add: 'provided the size is greater than or equal to sizeimage'. > > How about: > > The driver may also increase buffer sizes if required, however, it will > not update <structfield>sizeimage</structfield> field values. The > user has to use <constant>VIDIOC_QUERYBUF</constant> to retrieve that > information.</para> This may be a stupid question but would there be adverse effects from updating it? -- Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@xxxxxx jabber/XMPP/Gmail: sailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
