--- On Sun, 25/9/11, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ok, I've applied it, but it doesn't sound a good idea to me > to do: > > + mutex_unlock(&dev->lock); > em28xx_init_extension(dev); > + mutex_lock(&dev->lock); > Yes, I suppose it's the logical equivalent of moving the em28xx_init_extension(dev) call from em28xx_init_dev(), and placing it immediately after the final mutex_unlock(&dev->lock) call in em28xx_usb_probe() instead. Which would be cleaner, quite frankly. Which stage of the v4l2 initialisation triggers the race with udev? v4l2_device_register()? Cheers, Chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
