>> +static int bcap_qbuf(struct file *file, void *priv, >> + struct v4l2_buffer *buf) >> +{ >> + struct bcap_device *bcap_dev = video_drvdata(file); >> + struct v4l2_fh *fh = file->private_data; >> + struct bcap_fh *bcap_fh = container_of(fh, struct bcap_fh, fh); >> + >> + if (!bcap_fh->io_allowed) >> + return -EACCES; > > I suppose -EBUSY would be more appropriate here. > no, io_allowed is to control which file instance has the right to do I/O. >> + fmt =&bcap_formats[i]; >> + if (mbus_code) >> + *mbus_code = fmt->mbus_code; >> + if (bpp) >> + *bpp = fmt->bpp; >> + v4l2_fill_mbus_format(&mbus_fmt, pixfmt, >> + fmt->mbus_code); >> + ret = v4l2_subdev_call(bcap->sd, video, >> + try_mbus_fmt,&mbus_fmt); >> + if (ret< 0) >> + return ret; >> + v4l2_fill_pix_format(pixfmt,&mbus_fmt); >> + pixfmt->bytesperline = pixfmt->width * fmt->bpp; >> + pixfmt->sizeimage = pixfmt->bytesperline >> + * pixfmt->height; > > Still pixfmt->pixelformat isn't filled. > no here pixfmt->pixelformat is passed in >> + return 0; >> + } >> + } >> + return -EINVAL; > > I think you should return some default format, rather than giving up > when the fourcc doesn't match. However I'm not 100% sure this is > the specification requirement. > no, there is no default format for bridge driver because it knows nothing about this. all the format info bridge needs ask subdevice. >> +static const struct ppi_ops ppi_ops = { >> + .attach_irq = ppi_attach_irq, >> + .detach_irq = ppi_detach_irq, >> + .start = ppi_start, >> + .stop = ppi_stop, >> + .set_params = ppi_set_params, >> + .update_addr = ppi_update_addr, >> +}; > > How about moving this struct to the bottom of the file and getting rid of > all the above forward declarations ? > I'd like to put global varible before function in a file. >> + >> +void delete_ppi_instance(struct ppi_if *ppi) >> +{ >> + peripheral_free_list(ppi->info->pin_req); >> + kfree(ppi); >> +} > > As a side note, I was not sure if this is just a resend of your original > patches or a second version. It would be good to indicate that in the message > subject. I think it's not a big deal and makes the reviewers' life easier. if I don't add a version number in subject, it means it is the first version. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html